ext_113621 ([identity profile] austin-dern.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] austin_dern 2012-07-16 01:03 am (UTC)

You have a good hypothesis there. I wonder also if possibly the studio figured too fast a fire was a hazard they weren't willing to tolerate --- this was all shot in studio sets, sometimes painfully obviously so --- and figured that fire would just have to do by itself. Of course, studios were still using stuff like that spray-on foam that was basically accelerant with air bubbles through to the mid-70s, but they did at least try sometimes to keep the explosions down to a tolerable number.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting