ext_133039 ([identity profile] xolo.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] austin_dern 2012-07-17 01:34 am (UTC)

I don't think the Naval Review would really be relevant to audiences even a few years afterward. If they editted that in, then I'd suppose it happened in the summer of '34. They'd have to make new prints afterward, so that seems unlikely, since it would have been showing in secondary markets by that time, if it was in release at all. One of those things.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting