Profile

austin_dern: Inspired by Krazy Kat, of kourse. (Default)
austin_dern

May 2026

S M T W T F S
      1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 212223
24252627282930
31      

Custom Text

Most Popular Tags

I think that, somehow, I've lost my copy of Stephen Ambrose's Nothing Like It In the World, about the building of the Transcontinental Railroad. I probably use it as a trivia source too often anyway, but it really can't have gone missing -- I've only got a couple of piles of books of that size, which I've looked through, and it can't be in my office, and it's not in my luggage. That's not as embarrassing as having apparently lost my new debit card (it must be in here somewhere, too, but I have only two weeks to get it activated, and about three weeks before the first routine charge on it should happen), but it's disquieting to have my small possessions squirming out from under me. I did lose a sock, too, but that's to be expected, even when I take pretty careful count of their number.

Singapore Airlines is running ads pledging that from 1 March you can fly them to ``Fascinating Moscow''. I'm glad. They had flown too many times to ``Boring Moscow'', and you can only go to ``Middlingly Acceptable Moscow'' a certain number of times (four) before you're done, and the trips to ``The Binghamton of Moscow'' never sold as well as you'd imagine from that description.

I noticed the Software Update description of the Mac OS X 10.4.5 upgrade lists fixes for Safari rendering of web pages, for Dashboard usability, and for ``time zone and daylight savings for 2006 and 2007''. You can almost hear Steve Jobs thinking through the changes and upgrades for this version and ultimately having no choice but to summon his inner Count Floyd and say, ``look -- just -- download this already, it's got, you know, stuff and all that.''

Singapore's first wheelchair-friendly bus, with an extender ramp so that those in wheelchairs can get on and off, has been unveiled. It's a double-decker bus.

Trivia: For a charity performance in 1849 Charles Dickens dressed in exotic robes and presented himself as ``The Unparalleled Necromancer Rhia Rhama Rhoos.'' Source: The Rise of the Indian Rope Trick, Peter Lamont.

Currently Reading: Gotham: A History of New York City to 1898, by Edwin G Burrows, Mike Wallace.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-02-15 04:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] buran.livejournal.com
There's a law passed last year that changes the times at which the Daylight Savings switch takes place so anything that has the ability to do it automatically has to be updated.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-02-15 04:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] austin-dern.livejournal.com

I know, even though I live in a place that either never goes onto Daylight Saving Time or is always on it, depending on your point of view. It's just that when it comes to selling points for operating systems, ``reliable adjustment for Daylight Saving Time'' tends to rank pretty low, somewhere above ``feels like it's going faster if you make little vrooom noises'' but below ``has emulator for Atari 520 ST''.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-02-15 05:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] buran.livejournal.com
I can see why they'd tell you what they changed, though sometimes they're really vague in some of the fix descriptions.

Inquiring minds want to know!

(no subject)

Date: 2006-02-15 05:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] austin-dern.livejournal.com

True. On the one hand I'd like to have details; on the other, I wouldn't understand them anyway.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-02-16 12:13 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] porsupah.livejournal.com
With all this daylight being saved, can you redeem it at the end of the year for, say, a solid week of daytime, or a PSP?

(no subject)

Date: 2006-02-15 06:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] orv.livejournal.com
This is a major pain in the tail in my current job, where we have ten casinos with about fifty VCRs each, all of which now have to be manually configured with the new dates.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-02-15 07:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] buran.livejournal.com
Ugh. Contact the manufacturer to see if they have a firmware flash? At least it's only twice a year.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-02-15 11:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] orv.livejournal.com
They had enough foresight to make the start/stop dates for daylight savings time configurable. It's just a pain to have to reconfigure them all.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-02-16 03:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] austin-dern.livejournal.com

Just think of it as practice for when we switch over to 25-hour days.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-02-15 07:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] buran.livejournal.com
That said, I think it was rather shortsighted to change the dates. These people should know that it is a huge hassle to deal with and a lot of stuff can't be changed to handle it. There's some things that you just don't mess with.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-02-16 03:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] austin-dern.livejournal.com

I'm just curious why the fix was described as being effective only for 2006 and 2007. You'd think it would be indefinite.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-02-16 04:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] buran.livejournal.com
I was wondering that too actually. I have no idea!

(no subject)

Date: 2006-02-15 07:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chefmongoose.livejournal.com
I suppose as, with almost any upgrade past the second decimal point, it's so incremental as to try and have to plead for it, without wanting to mention the bugfixes and potential problems fixed too loudly.

... I take it the wheelchairs aren't intended to get onto the second deck. unless that's a ramp that extends very far indeed.

--Chiaroscuro

(no subject)

Date: 2006-02-16 12:14 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] porsupah.livejournal.com
I believe it's actually a very powerful spring.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-02-16 03:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] austin-dern.livejournal.com

Actually, since Apple's trying to stick to the X so much as possible, they pretty much use the first digit as the ``major version number''. So the minor version number has become the petty version number. Still, it's a pretty dull revision even as these things go.

I'd hope the wheelchairs are expected to stick to the first level, though you never know.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-02-16 04:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] buran.livejournal.com
Here's how it works:

The 10 indicates that this is System 10 and is compatible with all the other 10.x releases (mostly, although there are major changes in each 10.x that means that some software requires at least a certain major revision and no earlier).

The first decimal place indicates which major revision it is, and each has a codename to go with it. 0 was "Cheetah", 1 was "Puma" (though I may have these two reversed), 2 was "Jaguar", 3 was "Panther" and now we're on 4, "Tiger". The next one is going to be called "Leopard". Yes, I know that leopards and panthers are basically the same animal. ;)

The second decimal place indicates which system update it is. They start at 0, the initial stamped CDs you buy in the stores (although sometimes the CDs on the shelves become a later revision).

So, 10.4.5 = System 10, 4th major revision, 5th patch.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-02-15 08:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] spaceroo.livejournal.com
One rumor regaring this seemingly (mostly) pointless 10.4.5 update is that it contains copy protection/lockdown fixes to the x86 version. (The PPC version is mostly a schill to keep version numbers in lockstep.) It's an interesting coincidence that it's being released literally "hours" after a set of 10.4.4 "Generic PC" patches started circulating amongst the pirate crowd.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-02-16 12:17 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] porsupah.livejournal.com
I'm rather doubtful of that possibility, if only for the length of a QA cycle - it'd surely take a couple weeks from the "okay, this is what we want to release" to "ship it!". Unless, perhaps, these hackers are in cahoots with Apple. ^_^

BTW, I found this little OS X ditty (http://community.livejournal.com/macosx/4771148.html) amusing.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-02-16 12:22 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] spaceroo.livejournal.com
I'm rather skeptical that one has something to do with the other myself, but, hey, rumors are fun to spread.

My guess is they found some devestating network security vulnerability and decided to silently fix it before it hit the news. ;^)

(no subject)

Date: 2006-02-16 03:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] austin-dern.livejournal.com

I think they're trying to distract people from noticing they attempted to rhyme ``pirate'' with ``great'', myself.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-02-16 04:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] buran.livejournal.com
I saw that and it was painful because whoever wrote it was, indeed, pushing it. Can't they find at least one person there who writes GOOD poetry as a hobby?

(no subject)

Date: 2006-02-16 04:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] buran.livejournal.com
10.4.5 has been in the works for weeks. I saw the first rumors about it just days after 10.4.4 came out. It's just a coincidence.

They're trying to keep it running on Apple-made systems only because they're primarily in the hardware business, not software, and they would lose money if it's installed on generic PCs. So they do try to improve the locks, but they don't shove out random patches just to thwart it.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-02-16 08:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chefmongoose.livejournal.com
Well, they might be putting out patches with minor features, but have the hack-thwart as their main goal. Sony's been doing that muchly with the PSP, to try and keep homebrew users at bay. As Apple moves to Intel Chips.. I'd be unsurprised if the same happened to a degree.

And, you know, It's really time witht he shift to x86 to have an 11.0 . Otherwise we'll be seeing 10.7.19 in another few years and.. well, do I need to say that's just not right?

--Chiaroscuro

(no subject)

Date: 2006-02-16 08:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] buran.livejournal.com
Why not have a system 10.7.x? It fits the naming scheme.

Any thwart attempts weren't made because of these specific hackers, as people seem to be saying, but as a general attempt to revise the software and make it 'better'; if you think it was a knee-jerk response done in just a few days, you should look into software QA and how long it really takes. There is no way a patch would be shoved out in under a week -- especially since past patches have really screwed up peoples' systems.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-02-17 04:28 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chefmongoose.livejournal.com
Because, byt the time you get past x.5.. an honest x.5, not a halfway-named one like Firefox, which is really 1.2.. the upgrades cease to be minor ones, in my mind.

10,7 means you're rapidly appropaching 10.9, and there simply is no 10.10. It's just. not. Done.

--Chiaroscuro

(no subject)

Date: 2006-02-17 03:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] austin-dern.livejournal.com

But that's the thing, the revisions that would have been new version numbers have become the first-digit minor numbers now, so the hypothetical 10.7 would be what would otherwise have been something obscene like System 16, although they might have snuck some huge changes in with minor numbers (as in the System 7 to 7.5 change, or System 8 to 8.1). Call it System 14, which is silly enough as it is.

I seem to recall that they did get minor revisions up to 10.3.9, and there was some speculation what the next pre-10.4 update would be called, if it existed. My preference in the As The Apple Turns polls (alas) was ``10.3.9 Extreme''.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-02-17 08:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chefmongoose.livejournal.com
See, I'd find System 14 vs System 10.4 fairly reasonable. This is software that's beena round for a good 20 years or so.

I could mentally handle 10.3.10 better than, say, 10.10.3 . I think that's mostly SecondLife's upgrades getting to me, as well as my disenjoyment of four-figure upgrades, 10.3.9.1 or such.

--Chiaroscuro

(no subject)

Date: 2006-02-17 04:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] buran.livejournal.com
A version number change that big is reserved for really huge whopping changes, in software development. So yeah, it is done until there's a whole new rebuild of the software. It might be weird, but that's software for you.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-02-16 03:13 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] skylerbunny.livejournal.com
Now, of course, there's also the matter of your lost mass transit EZ-Link card. That one has a more concrete explanation - I simply stole it from you when I went home.

I'll have to get that back to you...

(no subject)

Date: 2006-02-16 03:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] austin-dern.livejournal.com

No, no, the card is accounted for. It's missing but I know why, and I'm not worried.