Profile

austin_dern: Inspired by Krazy Kat, of kourse. (Default)
austin_dern

January 2026

S M T W T F S
     1 2 3
4 5 6 78910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Custom Text

Most Popular Tags

Voting seems to have settled down on my informal little survey about how long the Pony Express operated, so I may as well reveal the answer. From your responses the most popular answer was ``about a year'', with eight votes; next-most popular was ``about ten years'' with six; and ``about five years'' with four votes. Bucking the trend the other answer, ``about 25 years'', didn't get any votes, at least when I checked and wrote this up.

The best answer was the first, about a year. Actually, the Pony Express ran for just about eighteen months between its first delivery (April 1860) and when they closed up shop (October 1861). It may have been a useful physical link and communications lifeline during some particularly challenging moments in United States history, but it was also a financial disaster which started out bleeding money and managed in short order to begin hemorrhaging it. It's hard to see where exactly the flaw in the business plan was: they just took a link which due to historical reasons provided a very low traffic rate, and built around 200 stations each needing staff and a small herd of horses, then hired a bunch of people to race through territory thick with bandits, hostile Indians, and absolutely unlivable terrain, to provide delivery in about ten days of just as many letters as could be stuffed into sleeves built into saddles, at a rate an order of magnitude higher than any other postal rate in the country, in the hopes that if they ran it long enough they might be able to get a government mail contract guaranteeing some minimum payment. Maybe they should have added ``dot com'' to their name and started giving away free plastic trinkets.

But I kid people who set out on ambitious projects without figuring out a reasonable projected budget from my secure spot a century and a half after the plan's flaws were revealed. Besides, as far as I can determine nobody actually studied whether businesses made any economic sense before about 1930, and then the results were so depressing nobody tried again until 1954. I exaggerate, but only slightly -- before James Webb (later of NASA fame) was at Truman's Bureau of the Budget there were shockingly few attempts to measure the economy. There's a curious alternate history, not to mention a good grand strategy game, to be seeded there: when Webb moved to the State Department he tried to introduce economics-style quantification of the world's political and diplomatic state. He couldn't get that started since so little of what he wanted could barely be guessed at, never mind actually measured, and he was busier trying to reform the State Department so that the Secretary of State could actually direct its employees to do things, and have them eventually done.

Trivia: AT&T's first coast-to-coast telephone line went into service in 1915. Source: Fortune's Formula, William Poundstone.

Currently Reading: Mister Lincoln's T-Mails, Tom Wheeler.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-02-11 01:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nsingman.livejournal.com
Measuring the economy is not a legitimately constitutional federal function. We shouldn't be doing it now. The federal government, with very few exceptions, is supposed to leave the economy alone.

However, you exaggerate more than slightly. Business and economic planning are as old as commerce itself; it's the nomenclature that has changed, and the forms of analysis that have changed (often to accommodate that governmental interference). The Pony Express was a failed venture, but they might well have had a good business plan. Then again, history is littered with good business plans, which only reveal their "flaws" after the fact, and sometimes not even then (or liars, thieves and charlatans like FDR and his New Dealers would be reviled by virtually everyone). :-)

(no subject)

Date: 2007-02-13 05:32 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] austin-dern.livejournal.com

Yes, yes, I exaggerate. If it weren't for hyperbole I wouldn't have any personality whatsoever, at least once my notes about Singapore run out. I know that throughout time business-connected people have formed what they thought were plans. Then again, Brainiac-5 regularly formed what he thought were plans too.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-02-13 01:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nsingman.livejournal.com
You're much too hard on yourself. It takes a lot of interesting personality characteristics to pick oneself up and travel around the world, for business or pleasure. Of course, you could always take the easy path to interest now and then and shoot for prurient interest. Tell us about Singapore's red light district! :-)

(no subject)

Date: 2007-02-14 05:01 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] austin-dern.livejournal.com

That would be Geylang, more or less, although as it happens I only had two nights spent there. And there was a bit of Bugis, although that was pretty well cleaned-up and turned into shopping arenas by the time I got to town.

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

Style Credit