Profile

austin_dern: Inspired by Krazy Kat, of kourse. (Default)
austin_dern

January 2026

S M T W T F S
     1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Custom Text

Most Popular Tags

Friday morning of the con I woke up and checked my phone to see if someone had arrived. Not [livejournal.com profile] bunny_hugger; she'd be later in the day. [livejournal.com profile] roofae instead.

[livejournal.com profile] roofae was to be at the con, and to share a room with several people, but the relative flights meant that the room reservers would not be able to get there before [livejournal.com profile] roofae did. So she needed a spot to at least drop off her gear for a few hours, and we (me/[livejournal.com profile] bunny_hugger/[livejournal.com profile] skylerbunny) were glad to offer it. And sure enough my phone was (a) on and (b) with me and (c) received the message, that [livejournal.com profile] roofae had arrived at some horribly early hour of the morning.

So I brought her up, and she --- I assume just lay still for a while, as I showered and other wise got ready for the day. We figured to put off getting breakfast as [livejournal.com profile] roofae is vegan and the hotel decidedly not, and I was waiting for [livejournal.com profile] bunny_hugger. Our best alternative for using the time seemed to be going through the registration line. It was a long registration line, slow-moving, and left me wondering if I had actually signed up as a sponsor since they had a much shorter line. I didn't think I had --- it seemed like a lot more for relatively few benefits that I'd use --- but in the twisting maze of retractable fabric belts it was easy to believe I might have. Also, we were stuck in line slightly ahead of some people who chatted, the whole time, about such subjects as how the Occupy Wall Street movement was foolish and the people in it should shut up whining and get jobs, which, ah, yeah. Also how they understood the true dynamics of fandom in the way useless drains on it like the con organizers didn't.

Anyway, afterward, we were hungry and got snacks from the convenience store, and [livejournal.com profile] bunny_hugger texted me that the train bringing her to Chicago was running late and I should eat without her. Better, though, [livejournal.com profile] roofae's roommates had arrived and she could move over to that room.

I went to one of the puppet track events --- it might seem like my default one, but I like them, so, where else should I go? --- which was about doing the hand motions for speech. To help improve the authenticity the panel organizers gave away a real tool such as Muppet Training Workshops use: a pair of ping-pong balls, with eyes painted on, strapped to a rubber band. You put them across your knuckles and, instant hand puppet where you can see what your fingers are doing as you maintain eye contact and do that sort of work. I had to run out of the last minutes of it, though, as [livejournal.com profile] bunny_hugger called, and I went to the lobby to find her, and hug her, a long, hard time.

She asked if I was going to keep the puppet eyes on my hand all weekend, because it was the sort of thing I'd do. I had been thinking about it, yes. She said it was creepy. I put the eyes away.

We didn't eat right away, though; she broke down and had a veggie burger on the train which was surprisingly better than she'd expected, and I'd had an extra round of snacking. We got through registration, too --- since it was after the Opening Ceremonies by a decent amount it was a tolerably short line --- and actually spent a while talking about our relationship. Also her brother's band and their new album.

We did very briefly get into artist's alley where BunnyHugger picked up a little pair of antlers. This she would wear with her ears, when not in fursuit, to give herself a jackalope makeover, to better fit the convention's ``Route 66'' theme.

For dinner we briefly examined the sports bar, which had one (1) kind of sushi which might be vegetarian, and then took a taxi out to a nearby Indian restaurant. The restaurant was divided by a long half-glass wall, and we were seated on the outer side of that, partitioned away from everybody else to start. This reminded me of the Chinese buffet restaurant where [livejournal.com profile] spaceroo and I worked a year at to finally get seated in the front half, back when he was at State University of New York/Albany. It was really, really good food, and we came out thinking that we had to tell everyone what they missed by not eating here. (The restaurant was named The Maharja in the con booklet, missing an ``a'' from a familiar Indian word; I supposed that the booklet was correct and so probably confused the cab driver in my efforts to pronounce the mutilated name.)

And BunnyHugger got back into fursuit for the dance, where I horrified her with my inability to connect recognition of the beat with any particular movement of my feet or other body pats. (I know it's there, it's just not in synch with my body's natural modes.) But I was doing marginally better as a fursuiter's handler this year, with her not really having to swat me for over- or under-managing. The only major point at which I failed to understand what she was pantomiming --- she doesn't speak in costume --- was at the designated charity booth where the animal rescue shelter had several rabbits on display. I should have gone with the standby, that a pantomime character making a fuss over something thinks it's interesting and neat and, as it involved small rabbits looking even more wide-eyed than usual at all the weird things going on, adorable.

A small thing I noticed as we were leaving the dance: one of the animal rescue people was holding up the white-and-black-spotted rabbit, who still looked as if it had no idea why it was getting so much attention from so many people who were so strange, and rocking its forepaws back and forth, to the beat. So the rescued rabbit could dance better than I could, even if it had more direct physical aid than did I.

Trivia: The second-stage thrust chamber in the rocket booster used for Vanguard's TV-3 launch had been test-fired for only fifty seconds, compared to the 200 seconds which would be required for a successful launch, but the accelerated post-Sputnik schedule permitted no further testing. Source: Project Vanguard: The NASA History, Constance McLaughlin Green, Milton Lomask.

Currently Reading: Fifty-Nine In '84: Old Hoss Radbourn, Barehanded Baseball, And The Greatest Season A Pitcher Ever Had, Edward Achorn.

PS: How Did Friday The 13th Get A Chance? Not the movies, the other kind.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-12-06 06:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] c-eagle.livejournal.com
You went to a con? wows!

(no subject)

Date: 2011-12-07 04:07 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] austin-dern.livejournal.com

Oh, yeah, Midwest FurFest. I hope I didn't miss you there.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-12-07 10:01 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] c-eagle.livejournal.com
Nupe.... haven't made it to that one yet :>

(no subject)

Date: 2011-12-08 04:30 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chefmongoose.livejournal.com
You need to make it to more east-coasty of conventions, C. You're in the top 3 of "People all my furry friends say are really awesome in person but I have yet to meet them because they don't make it to Anthrocon." :)

hehehe..

Date: 2011-12-08 08:15 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] c-eagle.livejournal.com
*shucks* .... I might just yet! ... I saved up and managed to get some time off to try E.F. this last Summer, so I may be inching closer to possible ^v^ .. *feathery waggles*

Re: hehehe..

Date: 2011-12-10 04:42 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] austin-dern.livejournal.com

I'm certainly interested in meeting you. And it's possible that I'll be getting to Anthrocon this coming year.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-12-07 08:12 pm (UTC)
ext_392293: Portrait of BunnyHugger. (Default)
From: [identity profile] bunny-hugger.livejournal.com
I was trying to say "It's tiny!" by holding my hands close together.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-12-10 04:41 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] austin-dern.livejournal.com

And now everyone can see how amazingly awful I am at understanding pantomime, however clear the context is.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-12-08 06:35 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chefmongoose.livejournal.com
and left me wondering if I had actually signed up as a sponsor since they had a much shorter line.

A fine reason to Sponsor at cons, and at most conventions, a good reason to Pre-register. I heard the MFF lines were substantial this year, they are.. growing and need to consider the future.

I like the notion of JackalopeHugger.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-12-10 04:40 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] austin-dern.livejournal.com

If the difference to be a sponsor here weren't as big as it was, I might have gone for it. But it was something like eighty dollars or so, and with the shorter queue the main benefit that wasn't worth it. (I might've made the sponsor's brunch, but expected that'd conflict with one of [livejournal.com profile] bunny_hugger's panels, since they're usually scheduled that way.)

(no subject)

Date: 2011-12-10 05:32 am (UTC)
ext_392293: Portrait of BunnyHugger. (Default)
From: [identity profile] bunny-hugger.livejournal.com
Yeah, the only con I sponsor at is FCN, because it's so cheap to.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-12-11 03:53 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] austin-dern.livejournal.com

I think I got a sponsorship for Morphicon, which was also pretty cheap, although that amounted to just some extra stuff in my con-stuff booklet.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-12-11 06:08 am (UTC)
ext_392293: Portrait of BunnyHugger. (Default)
From: [identity profile] bunny-hugger.livejournal.com
I got one the first year I went and I got an art print that... is still in my closet somewhere, I expect. What you would have gotten for that, by the way, was an ice cream social, but I don't think you took advantage of it. The year I sponsored, the ice cream was really cheap and bad, so that wasn't much of an incentive.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-12-11 08:40 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chefmongoose.livejournal.com
I enjoy the sponsor art prints; but they end up where all my art prritns end up, in manilla folders in a drawer.

Sponsorship is really more about helping cons out than the perks you get back, but it's nice when the perks are good ones.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-12-12 02:59 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] austin-dern.livejournal.com

That was much of my thinking about sponsoring for Morphicon, that it was worth it to help the con.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-12-12 03:00 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] austin-dern.livejournal.com

I had thought you'd sponsored Morphicon too, at least one time around. But I imagine you have a better memory of those that I have.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-12-17 04:19 pm (UTC)
ext_392293: Portrait of BunnyHugger. (Default)
From: [identity profile] bunny-hugger.livejournal.com
Only the first year I went.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-12-18 05:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] austin-dern.livejournal.com

Ah, that explains it. I must have imprinted on that and once an idea gets into my head, it takes tactical nuclear weapons to get it out again.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-12-11 08:39 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chefmongoose.livejournal.com
To note, Anthrocon's prices run about $50 for Attending, $100 for Sponsor and $200 for Supersponsor[*1]; we're on the higher end of prices but by no means excessive. Sponsor also tends to get you a few extra things, usually "This year's T-shirt" is a typical one.

--Chi
[*1] Attending varies from $45-60 depending on date of registration, and other prices follow similarly.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-12-12 02:56 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] austin-dern.livejournal.com

That's better-balanced. I checked and apparently Midwest Furfest had attendance at $40, and sponsorship at $120, and that's just too big a gap to my eyes. $50 to $100 is ... well, I suppose it would depend on just how big my ordinary-expenses credit card bill the month I registered was. At least the gap doesn't feel too big.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-12-12 07:00 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chefmongoose.livejournal.com
Their Supersponsor cost is $250 as well; but I recall they tend to have a Sponsor's Lounge of foodstuffs, which Anthrocon has outsourced for about three good reasons. Food can be a.. major perk.

It does surprise me it's that high comparatively; most furry conventions try and keep the Sponsor price at about 2x Basic, and the Supersponsor/Patron/etc at about 4x-5x basic. (Occasionally there's an Ultra Sponsorship, Lifetime Membership, or crazy things like RMFC selling a seat on their board for $5,000.) But the overall goal is to keep that attending price low and attractive, to draw in curious locals and thin-budgeted furries. Anthrocon's tried hard to keep our Attending membership at $40-50, but this year it's $45-60, and we worry a bit at people balking at.. what's still one of the cheaper factors in convention costs.

I'll admit with a bit of embarrassment that I've never paid for a Sponsor level at a furry convention. ..in part because over half of the furry conventions I've attended I have been on staff, and staff usually get sponsor-level perks.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-12-14 03:20 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] austin-dern.livejournal.com

I think there was a SuperSponsor con lounge, yes, although since the ordinary con lounge is just about sufficient for normal needs --- here I mean, grabbing something to snack on because it's just too long between meals --- that's not enticing to me. I'd typically go fending for real meals on my own anyway.

$60 still doesn't seem much for con attendance, but I am speaking as someone who doesn't have to do the ``well, if I only eat three-quarters of the ramen pack for two weeks I can just about afford travelling there and I know two people who'll let me sleep in their hotel rooms three hours each Friday night, I'm in!'' dance of dubious budgeting.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-12-17 04:21 pm (UTC)
ext_392293: Portrait of BunnyHugger. (Default)
From: [identity profile] bunny-hugger.livejournal.com
The sponsor lounge at FCN serves enough food that I tend not to have to eat out all my meals at FCN, which helps keep that one cheap for me. Sadly, all the hot food in the con suite at MFF was vegetarian hostile again this year.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-12-18 05:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] austin-dern.livejournal.com

That's a pretty good consideration.

I was willing to charitably suppose we just missed the vegetarian-friendly hot stuff at the con suite; we did after all just drop in a couple times. But we never did see the remnants of what might've been a vegetarian-friendly selection, did we? I would've done fine with bread and cheese, but that's hardly hot, and I have atrocious eating habits anyway.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-12-18 08:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chefmongoose.livejournal.com
Anthrocon's eliminated our Supersponsor lounge due to a lot of logistical problems, mainly, our Supersponsors could easily be a small convention on their own. We instead partner with local eateries and give about $20 in coupons out. We also have a Supersponsor luncheon, which has vegetarian-friendly options.

The truly vegetarian hostile Sponsor perk was FA:U 2010, which advertised bacon (http://twitpic.com/1ru3xy) as a sponsorship gift. ...I was tempted to, if attending, throw a fit over that on behalf of vegetarians.
Edited Date: 2011-12-19 05:53 pm (UTC)

(no subject)

Date: 2011-12-21 04:38 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] austin-dern.livejournal.com

Oh, bacon isn't obnoxious just to vegetarians. It's also obnoxious to people who are sick of the fetishization of bacon. It may be comic-ironic, it may be sincere, but, gads it was overdone eight years ago and it's only gotten worse since.

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

Style Credit